The New Compass: A Critical Review
Letter
from
Gordon Harvey
It
has been a bad winter. Storms have raged
up and down the Northeast corridor, stopping trains and planes and flattening
the world to white: trees bent heavy,
cars in burial mounds, spumes from smokestacks drifting in the frozen sky, and
a clamping cold that turns every gust off the Charles into a blade. I remember this cold from my days in
The
landscape not being an interest of Drummond’s, we would usually not be
contemplating poems about it, although there were occasional exceptions:
One must
have a mind of winter,
To regard
the frost and the boughs
Of the pine
trees crusted with snow;
And have
been cold a long time
To behold
the junipers shagged with ice,
The spruces
rough in the distant glitter
Of the
January sun; and not to think
Of
any misery in the sound of the wind …
What
impressed Drummond about Wallace Stevens’ “The Snow Man,” I recall, was its
evocation of absence:
and not to think
Of any
misery in the sound of the wind,
In the sound
of a few leaves,
Which
is the sound of the land
Full of the
same wind
That is
blowing in the same bare place
For the
listener, who listens in the snow,
And, nothing
himself, beholds
Nothing
that is not there and the nothing that is.
He beholds
the nothing that is there: he feels, as
if it were also the winter of mankind, the absence of human meaning in the
landscape of the sort that earlier beholders have felt there; and he feels this
absence as a palpable presence.
In
the months after Drummond’s sudden death, one felt him palpably absent
everywhere, even here in
Drummond’s absence was also still palpable, this
winter, further down the frigid corridor at the MLA conference in
On
the streets outside the MLA hotels this year, of course, one also felt a larger
and more impersonal kind of absence, whose emblem is the wound, no longer
smoking but still gaping, that is Ground Zero:
an absent faith in one’s security and in the limits of animosity. One felt also the peculiar power of a sudden
absence to make people feel vulnerable and lose their bearings—a power
illustrated some months ago by a run on duct tape, now by a war. That the news of Drummond’s death also gave
some of us a twinge that went beyond grief testifies to his role as the
embodiment of a faith, the faith that clear thinking and talking and criticism
were humanly improving, and the topography they created was roughly true. Drummond surely felt the absence of this
faith at recent MLAs, and surely felt it as he
wandered Harvard Yard and the new Humanities Center, with its self-consciously
World-Class woodwork and fireplaces, and studied the flashy course offerings
posted outside the new offices of the English Department, which serves a
steadily dwindling number of English majors. Yet he continued to check off his
choices and give his careful reasons, to exemplify belief.
He wanted to believe more. Stevens has said that “The
Snow Man” is about the need to imaginatively “identify with reality in order to
understand it and enjoy it,” rather than be depressed by its ultimate
indifference. But Drummond heard “a mind of winter” differently, heard “one
must have a cold clear mind not to project one’s desire for belief onto reality.”
His ability to identify with and enjoy the older works he taught—by Donne, Jonson, Shakespeare, Milton, Bunyan—made him the great
teacher he was; his inhabiting them so vividly made them live, through him, for
us. But it also made him aware of what in them he couldn’t fully inhabit,
however he might wish to. And unlike other students of past literature who have
felt the pull of its faith—we should remember how large the question loomed in
the critical landscape of Drummond’s youth, in Eliot, Tate, and others—he
needed to keep clear about what he could and could not believe, to draw the
line rather than hedge around it or blur it with religiosity or nostalgia, or
leap across without being called.
But
Drummond’s clarity was never cold, was indeed an invitation to identify with
past works by treating them with a seriousness about
life commensurate with their own. What does seem cold, by contrast, although
Drummond’s preference for the clear-headed spared his students having to
entertain it, is the ironic attitude towards the religious past that informs
some versions of modernism: the attitude
that one can draw on, allude to, the serious feelings and occasions of the past
and at the same time insist upon one’s ironic distance from them. Thus Auden’s elegy for Yeats:
He
disappeared in the dead of winter:
The
brooks were frozen, the airports almost deserted,
And
the snow disfigured the public statues;
The
mercury sank in the mouth of the dying day.
O
all the instruments agree
The day of his death was a dark cold day.
In a deeper sense than the descriptive, this leaves
one cold. Brooks bump against airports, and the old-fashioned “O all … agree”
bumps against “instruments”; the figure of mercury sinking in the mouth of day is
deliberately strained and modern, perhaps meaning to place quotation marks
around the clichés “dead of winter” and “dark cold day” and the coarse rhythms
and alliterating on “death,” but in fact only producing something too unstable,
too unclear in feeling, to embody thought or to be habitable by the reader’s
own experience of loss.
Whereas,
to change seasons and settings, one can bring one’s experience to a poem like
the following, despite its more private occasion. Edgar Bowers, who died the winter
before Drummond, was (besides a great poet) another one whose faith in
conversation, and whose ability to clear-headedly inhabit older works, made him
a great teacher. And Bowers’ absence is still palpable—again here in
Almost
four years, and though I merely guess
What
happened, I can feel the minutes' rush
Settle
like snow upon the breathless bed—
And we who loved you, elsewhere, ignorant.
From
my deck, in the sun, I watch boys ride
Complexities
of wind and wet and wave:
Pale
shadows, poised a moment on the light's
Archaic and divine indifference.
Drummond would like, I think,
the way Bowers locates his personal loss in the emotion of the ages, and the
way his fully inhabiting a symbolic tradition makes for unstrained intellectual
density. Snow, in this setting, is the
opposite of life, is the alien principle of crystalline fixity. In “Settle like snow upon the breathless
bed,” “breathless” is the state just before death and the state just after;
“Settle like snow” suggests moments accumulating (as in the base of an
hourglass), but also a body settling for the last time, and also that body
being covered with a final blanket. But
the human world, as here presented, isn’t just change and death; it is a state
of in-between. Our lives are moments of poise between the sea, the dark principle
of time in its ceaseless motion and freshness (“wind and wet and wave”), and
the remote sun of constant spiritual being: “archaic” because it shone on the
world's foundation, and shone also when ancient Greek boys tried their skill
and later died and were mourned, and has always shone, indiscriminately, on the
tragic and the trivial. The modern boys are "pale shadows" because
they appear light against the dark sea, but also because they partake of the
light of mind, use its illumination to momentarily master nature by deft calculation.
But they are also pale in the sense of being not fully bright: they reflect
light but also partake of the dark, as material beings not transparent to light
that therefore cast shadows on the water, and as beings that will pass away on
a breathless bed. In “the light’s/
Archaic and divine indifference,” “divine” is a metaphor for god-like
detachment, but a metaphor that also carries the literal implication that the
light is all of divinity that we can know.
And although the cosmic perspective of the last line places this
particular passing as a mere personal moment in the impersonal story of time,
the final word “indifference” is laden with its opposite—is laden, as these
Cambridge snows have been laden, with an undiminished feeling of loss.
Harvey,
Gordon. “Letter from